L'Artisan Dzongkha fragrance review

L'Artisan Dzongkha fragranceL'Artisan Dzongka is the third fragrance in the travel series that includes Bois Farine and Timbuktu. Dzongka was developed by Bertrand Duchaufour, and was inspired by the Dzongs of Bhutan. The fragrance notes include peony, lychee, cardamom, tea with milk, vetiver, incense, cypriol (a grass used to make papyrus), cedar, leather and iris.

Dzongkha was one of the few fragrances that I was really looking forward to this year, and I am happy to report that it did not disappoint, in fact, I like it even better than I expected. It is heavily dominated by iris, one of my favorite notes; iris is listed in the heart and base notes but is evident almost from the first, along with sweet floral notes that I would never have identified as peony. For that matter, I wouldn't have picked out the lychee either.

As it settles, it gets drier and earthier and takes on a subtle little buzz of spice from the cardamom. The iris stays velvety-cool in a way that nicely evokes the stones of a temple in a far-off land, as advertised. It is an odd fragrance (in the best possible way), but not quite so odd or hard to wear as Timbuktu, the other Bertrand Duchaufour fragrance in this series. Fans of Timbuktu, and of Duchaufour's Paestum Rose for Eau d'Italie, will recognize some common notes, especially in the dry down; of the three, I will say that Paestum Rose is the most easily wearable, Dzongkha the most otherworldly, and Timbuktu handily retains its title for outright weirdness. Meanwhile, Bertrand Duchaufour is fast moving up the list of my favorite perfumers, and I am very much looking forward to his new scents for Eau d'Italie, Sienne l'Hiver and Bois d'Ombrie, which according to today's Women's Wear Daily should appear in the US in January 2007.

Dzongkha is a unisex fragrance, and is available in 50 and 100 ml bottles of Eau de Toilette. The lasting power is excellent.

On a side note, Dzongkha is the first L'Artisan scent that I've purchased in the recently redesigned bottle, and I have to say that I hate the packaging. It has a rather clunky appearance that is not nearly as elegant as the old bottle. The cap looks just like a bolt head, and is nearly as heavy as the bottle itself. It looks like it was particularly designed to attract men to the brand: the kind of men who would be embarrassed by a bottle with even a modicum of femininity about it. Bah.

For buying information, see the listing for L'Artisan under Perfume Houses.

Filed in topic:

Tags:

48 Comments

Read more about commenting at Now Smell This.

  1. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    It is a favourite of mine too. I liked Narcisse as well, but not enough to spend $300+ on it.

  2. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    Hurrah! You a) like it and b) also get lots of iris. I am waiting for my bottle to arrve, this will be my first redesigned L'Artisan bottle. I wish they didn't mess with what was if not perfection then at least a very nice design.

  3. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    V, I just adored Fleur d'Oranger and STILL wouldn't spend 300 on it, so the chances of Narcisse joining my collection are distant at best, LOL…

  4. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    M, I can't really explain why, but the cap REALLY annoys me. Also happens to be just like the stupid cap for YSL L'Homme, which as it turns out looked even stupider in person than it did in pictures.

    Admittedly I was tired of the old design (probably because I have so many of them) but this is a step in the wrong direction.

  5. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    How wonderful is that, R? You found a fragrance that you like even more than you thought you would!

    I will definitely test this in the very near future!

    Hugs!

  6. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    R, it is wonderful and rare!

  7. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    heh heh, sounds like something I would hate Robin. we really are evil twins eh? :-)

    Very nice review!

  8. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    Loved this one too! I've heard others say they hated it, so I'm glad to see you like it!

  9. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    L, so nice to see you! Yes, guessing you would detest Dzongkha. Any new fragrance loves for you lately?

  10. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    Wouldn't think it would be universally loved, but it seems more wearable than Timbuktu. Actually I'm surprised Timbuktu sells enough to not be discontinued, but what do I know :-)

  11. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    I can't wait to try this one, R! I am a big Timbuktu fan, and I'm hoping to love this one as well. Have to see that new bottle too. It seems to be causing quite a commotion here!

  12. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    OK, I seem to be alone in getting lots of wet, soapy vetiver in the drydown? Sigh. I still like it, in top notes, mostly. If it didn't get so soapy, I'd love it more.

  13. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    K, hope you will love it! Did you try Paestum Rose yet?

    As to the bottle, well, gosh, I'm just easily riled apparently. It isn't exactly a huge change, LOL…

  14. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    Hmmm, vetiver yes, but wet soapy vetiver, not exactly to my nose, although wet soapy vetiver would be like Guerlain Vetiver, right? And I love Guerlain Vetiver. Not sure that is what you meant though.

  15. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    I'm really puzzled. I get an overwhelming sense of saffron from Dzongkha, which is not one of the listed notes at all. I don't get the incense, and just a suggestion of the iris. Either it's my nose playing tricks, or my sample has been contaminated with Safran Troublant! I'll try it again tonight, and see if I smell anything different. I may have to venture into London to sniff the bonafide juice…

  16. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    I detest the new caps too – in fact, I detest all bottles that have very heavy caps. But I'm happy to hear you liked the juice. I can only wear Timbuktu layered over a sweet lotion like Warm Vanilla Sugar or JPG2 massage oil.

  17. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    I saw another comment somewhere (on MUA probably) saying not too much iris, but I can't imagine it…the iris is very pronounced. The incense probably less so. I think it is classified as a woody chypre, if that is at all helpful.

  18. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    This is much easier to wear. I have actually grown to love Timbuktu, but I still have to be in the right mood or it wears me instead of the other way around.

  19. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    I'm not usually a spice/incense girl, but this one sounds awfully nice. I particularly like the mix of floral scents & herbs listed in the notes. I am with everyone else on the bottle re-design: stupid and pointless – not appreciably different, just clunkier.

    Do you know how Dzongkha is pronounced?

  20. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    It isn't loaded with either spice or incense, so do try it! And I have no idea how Dzongkha is pronounced & am probably saying it wrong myself :-)

  21. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 October 2006

    R, I can not wait to try this one! An SA at Barney's told me that if I love Dzing! (which I do), then I will totally dig Dzongkha. Hey, am I the only one who likes the new L'Artisan cap? I happen to like straight lines and sharp angles. However, I wish they had not messed with the the bottle itself. There was no need to move to odd numbers.

  22. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    I really must try this.

    I love Paestum Rose and Bois d'Ombrie, so Dzongkha sounds very very good indeed.

  23. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    I really liked this, in spite of its cool, remote nature, and bought a small size recently.

    It's interesting, several SA's detest it, feel it's too cardboardy… one referred to it as “Dzing on crack” !

    I think it grows on you – first it's intriguing, then it's pretty, then you love it.

    I don't think it fosters moderate responses.

  24. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    Hey, wonder if the SA is right. I don't find it very Dzing-ish, except that they are both rather odd so perhaps if you'll accept one you'll accept the other? LOL…let me know what you think of it.

  25. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    And I can't wait to try Bois d'Ombrie — glad to hear someone loves it!

  26. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    Dzing on crack, LOL…I would have thought it was the other way around — but still, I think you're right that it isn't necessarily a love at first sniff kind of fragrance.

  27. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    Wow! Lots of great reviews and postings while I was at work yesterday. I get mostly iris from this, and while I liked it, it didn't knock me out. I think I need to try it again, though; I didn't pick up any resemblance to Dzing!, which I love. I can't wait to try Bois d'Ombrie!

  28. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    Not sure it is the sort of thing that would knock you out at first sniff — might be a sleeper sort of scent. Nothing in common with Dzing other than smelling unusual, IMHO, and completely agree on Bois d'Ombrie!

  29. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    I just happened to sample Dzongkha this morning and my first thought was “WOW, this smells just like Johnson's Baby Shampoo but on steroids.”

    A bit later it starts to mellow and a leather note starts to come through very loud and clear.

    I find it to be almost masculine, but not quite. I also find it to be pretty but not in a frou-frou girlie way.

    It has grown on me but I'm not sure I'm ready to purchase a full bottle. It's quite different / unique and that may be the only reason I may consider purchasing it in the future. Maybe.

    Dawn

  30. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 October 2006

    Almost masculine but not quite is a perfect description, and love “Johnson's Baby Shampoo but on steroids”, LOL…

  31. Anonymous
    Posted on 20 October 2006

    are you serious Timbuktu is one of l'artisans best sellers..

    I find it extremely provocative and sensual

    as for Dongkha… Love it, sampled it at the Madison Boutique 3 months ago… new it was a hit.

  32. Anonymous
    Posted on 20 October 2006

    Glad to hear it…

  33. Anonymous
    Posted on 9 December 2006

    I'm waiting for my sample from luckyscent. Can't wait to see if I like it more than Timbuktu, which I really like except it's a little bit too masculine. Yet hate frou-frou girly. Need Goldilocks to find perfect fit… somewhere on the female side of unisex without any sweetness …

  34. Anonymous
    Posted on 9 December 2006

    As I just mentioned under your comment to Timbuktu, I'd also recommend Eau d'Italie's Paestum Rose as worth a try. It is also by Bertrand Duchaufour, and all of these (Timbuktu, Dzongkha, Paestum Rose) have some similar notes. Of the 3, Timbuktu strikes me as the most masculine.

  35. Anonymous
    Posted on 18 December 2006

    :-( ( my sample of Dzongkha came crushed. Maybe an angry mail carrier… who knows. So I still haven't tried it. Loved your review of Paestum Rose. Didn't see it on lucky to try though. Since my real name is Rose, I usually shy away from the scent. Soooo predictable. My whole life I've gotten rose scented EVERYTHING. But it does sound enticing. I also want to try 10 Corso Como (also crushed). To be continued. PS I love your reviews!

  36. Anonymous
    Posted on 18 December 2006

    Oh, so very sorry about your samples! That makes me so crazy when I'm looking forward to trying something and then it has leaked or been crushed. Hope you'll be able to get them replaced.

    The Paestum Rose is at Aedes, listed under “Le Sirenuse – Eau d' Italie”. Do try it, it is anything but a predictable rose.

    And thanks for the nice words!

  37. Anonymous
    Posted on 25 June 2007

    I love Timbuktu!!!

  38. Anonymous
    Posted on 25 June 2007

    I do too, but it took awhile to grow on me.

  39. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 November 2007

    wonderful review, and wonderful site; (i'm a longtime and very appreciative lurker.) so, i've had Dzonghka on by desk, dabbed on a strip of blotter paper, for the past two days, and it could not have a tighter grip on me if it were king kong and i were fay wray. when i wear it, even a little on the back of my hand, i can't do anything except smell it again and again, puzzling over it, “gnawing” on it, rather. i can't begin to say what the riveting weirdeness of it is, but it has a quality way beyond “nice” or “not nice.” i find it stranger than both timbuktu and dzing. something in it declares a disturbing distant kinship with The Different Company's Sel et Vetiver, another recent preoccupation, but maybe i have begun to hallucinate things. in any event, your review has helped me greatly in thinking through this fragrance; that's good news, because thinking about it appears too be the only thing I can do lately.

  40. Anonymous
    Posted on 16 November 2007

    Hello Sal, and welcome! I wouldn't have linked it to Sel de Vetiver, now I'll have to try them together. Interesting that you find Dzongkha stranger than Dzing or Timbuktu, I would have said the opposite.

    Have you tried the Paestum Rose yet?

  41. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 November 2007

    I'll have to try dzing and timbuktu again. maybe it's my chemistry. i've got a sample of paestum rose on the way. today, am pondering samples of malle's musc ravageur and bigarade concentrée. have you ever considered reviewing them?

  42. Anonymous
    Posted on 17 November 2007

    Both are great scents that don't suit me at all, I'm afraid!

  43. Anonymous
    Posted on 5 June 2008

    Eee, I'm poking an old review. xD I was moseying around and was caught first by the name and then the glittering review.
    I ordered some samples from LuckyScent and this was one of them. It is by far my favorite. What an amazing scent it is! What's more, I can smell nearly all of the notes listed (peony and lychee evaded me as well,though) which is a first. I think I'm getting better at note-identification. I've also discovered that this is how I like my iris: anchored with a dry base. The perfume opens a little strangely on me (a cross between citronella and minty gum) but the base is just so warm and lovely.
    My friends hate it (it's been called noxious, dirty, and nose-searing) but I'm really excited by it. I secretly think that when someone doesn't like a perfume, I like it even more. o…o;; Anyway, I'm planning on buying a bottle as soon as the weather changes again; I don't think it would work too well is sweltering heat.
    But thank you for the review. You're just so darned helpful.
    And in regards to the bottle: granted, I haven't seen it up close but I like the bottle. The bolt-y top is odd, but the whole bottle has presence; it's not silly, like a lot of the main-stream ones floating around. I'd like to have the bottle on my shelf.

  44. Anonymous
    Posted on 5 June 2008

    Upon reapplication (xP) I'd describe the top notes as hay and cardamom, with a hint of incense. I think the hay scent I get is vetyver (I don't actually know what it smells like; I just know it's a grass) but I don't want to seem like a total newbie and peg the scent as the wrong note. xD

  45. Anonymous
    Posted on 5 June 2008

    HA — I peg notes wrong all the time, who cares? Vetiver can smell sort of like hay (it is a grass, but the essence comes from the root, and to me it also smells very earthy), and so can coumarin.

    But so glad you like Dzongka even if your friends don't, and now you need to try everything else by Bertrand Duchaufour — many of his fragrances are in this same style, and they're simply awesome.

  46. Anonymous
    Posted on 5 June 2008

    Oh, okay. That's good to know. =3

    I certainly will, though I'm hoping I can find a L'Artisan counter around here; online decanters would render me broke for all the ones I want to try. Dx

  47. Anonymous
    Posted on 26 January 2009

    I really thought I would love this, but I'm afraid my newbie nose isn't ready for it! All I could smell was incense and leather–it reminded me of an old book that you would find in the library of some impressive manor, such as Hearst Castle or the Biltmore. Not that it's a bad thing!! I'm just not sure that's what I want to smell like. I couldn't smell any of the flowers, chai, or vetiver. I'm going to put this away for when my nose has become more refined…or maybe less so?

  48. Anonymous
    Posted on 27 January 2009

    I don't know if it's about teaching your nose to be more refined or distinguishing between “what you want to smell like” and “what you want to smell”. If I like a smell, I want to smell it…and my body is just a convenient way to carry that smell around, if that makes any sense! At any rate, yes, put it away for 6 months. If you still don't like it then, no big deal — it might just not suit you.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Shop for perfume


  • Subscribe to NST

  • Search

  • Browse by…

  • Advertisement

    Four Seasons Products
  • Blogroll

  • Soapbox


    Free Rice

    Electronic Freedom Foundation