<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bond no. 9 for Harrods ~ new fragrances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-109950</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-109950</guid>
		<description>That is good news, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is good news, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cazaubon</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-109835</link>
		<dc:creator>cazaubon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-109835</guid>
		<description>The good news is that the Harrods oud scent will be released in a non-crystal bottle on Nov. 1st, available at the NYC Bond boutiques.  I&#039;m on the waiting list. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that the Harrods oud scent will be released in a non-crystal bottle on Nov. 1st, available at the NYC Bond boutiques.  I&#8217;m on the waiting list. <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-99071</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-99071</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know...could be that they weren&#039;t happy with the designs, could be that the whole thing was too expensive, could be something else I haven&#039;t thought of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t know&#8230;could be that they weren&#8217;t happy with the designs, could be that the whole thing was too expensive, could be something else I haven&#8217;t thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-98919</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-98919</guid>
		<description>Maybe they realized that they picked absolutely terrible designs that would look laughable on a real bottle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they realized that they picked absolutely terrible designs that would look laughable on a real bottle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mals86</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97866</link>
		<dc:creator>mals86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97866</guid>
		<description>You could say it&#039;s a tiara.  (c&#039;mon, look at it... it could be a crown.)  All the same, I don&#039;t see myself buying it.  It&#039;s just that I thought all the other Bond No. 9 Swarovski crystal bottles were ugggggly, and this was wasn&#039;t, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could say it&#8217;s a tiara.  (c&#8217;mon, look at it&#8230; it could be a crown.)  All the same, I don&#8217;t see myself buying it.  It&#8217;s just that I thought all the other Bond No. 9 Swarovski crystal bottles were ugggggly, and this was wasn&#8217;t, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss kitty v.</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97831</link>
		<dc:creator>miss kitty v.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97831</guid>
		<description>Not worth the price tag--my sentiments exactly. They&#039;re good but not...great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not worth the price tag&#8211;my sentiments exactly. They&#8217;re good but not&#8230;great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss kitty v.</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97830</link>
		<dc:creator>miss kitty v.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97830</guid>
		<description>We could start a support group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could start a support group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absolute Scentualist</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97816</link>
		<dc:creator>Absolute Scentualist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97816</guid>
		<description>These sound nice enough but not for the price. The only bottle I&#039;ve bought thus far has been Chinatown. Not that I don&#039;t like any of the rest. I just can&#039;t see spending so much on them when they aren&#039;t all that terribly unique. Lovely, yes, but I&#039;ve had my share of buyer&#039;s remorse and recognize this could easily be the case with some of the Bond scents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sound nice enough but not for the price. The only bottle I&#8217;ve bought thus far has been Chinatown. Not that I don&#8217;t like any of the rest. I just can&#8217;t see spending so much on them when they aren&#8217;t all that terribly unique. Lovely, yes, but I&#8217;ve had my share of buyer&#8217;s remorse and recognize this could easily be the case with some of the Bond scents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97791</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97791</guid>
		<description>They called it off! Don&#039;t know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They called it off! Don&#8217;t know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinery</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2009/07/21/bond-no-9-for-harrods-new-fragrances/#comment-97777</link>
		<dc:creator>vinery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/?p=19628#comment-97777</guid>
		<description>Has there been an update on the Brooklyn bottle decorating contest?  Weren&#039;t they supposed o announce a winner at the end of June, or have I completely missed the result?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there been an update on the Brooklyn bottle decorating contest?  Weren&#8217;t they supposed o announce a winner at the end of June, or have I completely missed the result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/314 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 12:14:00 -->
