<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity perfume news round-up 2008, part the tenth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:59:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43230</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43230</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about &quot;almost certainly be interesting&quot; -- so far I&#039;ve seen very little correlation between the personality of the celebrity &amp; the scent, you know? Except a tiny bit w/ Sarah Jessica Parker. The rest of them seem to do whatever Coty/Parlux/whomever says will sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know about &#8220;almost certainly be interesting&#8221; &#8212; so far I&#39;ve seen very little correlation between the personality of the celebrity &#038; the scent, you know? Except a tiny bit w/ Sarah Jessica Parker. The rest of them seem to do whatever Coty/Parlux/whomever says will sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43203</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43203</guid>
		<description>Kiera Knightly is kinda creepy, no? The commercial always gave me chills when it came on and she looks positively... not nice... in the ads; airbrushed to high heavens but still.... She&#039;s just off-putting to me. I, for the life of me, can&#039;t think of a better replacement, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kiera Knightly is kinda creepy, no? The commercial always gave me chills when it came on and she looks positively&#8230; not nice&#8230; in the ads; airbrushed to high heavens but still&#8230;. She&#39;s just off-putting to me. I, for the life of me, can&#39;t think of a better replacement, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43229</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43229</guid>
		<description>It does seem really artificial for her to come out with beauty products; she&#039;s always &quot;Oh, I&#039;m so above being pretty.&quot; However, it would almost certainly be interesting, no? She doesn&#039;t seem like a gourmand/floral/fruit person, does she? At least an oriental; maybe even a hard leather. =o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem really artificial for her to come out with beauty products; she&#39;s always &#8220;Oh, I&#39;m so above being pretty.&#8221; However, it would almost certainly be interesting, no? She doesn&#39;t seem like a gourmand/floral/fruit person, does she? At least an oriental; maybe even a hard leather. =o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43228</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43228</guid>
		<description>How did I manage to say three things when I meant to say two? Mine, I&#039;m meant to post comments! (At least I still have my common sense...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did I manage to say three things when I meant to say two? Mine, I&#39;m meant to post comments! (At least I still have my common sense&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43232</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43232</guid>
		<description>I liked that one too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked that one too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43227</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43227</guid>
		<description>Two things:

1. &quot;Hotly denying&quot; a rumour is very typical of Chanel. The PR division usually either refuses to comment or hotly denies a rumour. Neither of which are the best strategies (sigh).

2. The Emma Watson + Chanel rumours have been going on since last July so we&#039;ll see how it unfolds next month.

3. To be quite honest I&#039;m very surprised that Chanel doesn&#039;t exercise an extension option with Keira&#039;s contract. The latest campaign is barely a year old and dropping Knightley represents another major investments. I would think it&#039;s cheapter to release another print ad...it&#039;s still costly but a fraction of the other option. (Must have something to do with Helleu&#039;s passing, but who knows?)

Those are my thoughts for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;Hotly denying&#8221; a rumour is very typical of Chanel. The PR division usually either refuses to comment or hotly denies a rumour. Neither of which are the best strategies (sigh).</p>
<p>2. The Emma Watson + Chanel rumours have been going on since last July so we&#39;ll see how it unfolds next month.</p>
<p>3. To be quite honest I&#39;m very surprised that Chanel doesn&#39;t exercise an extension option with Keira&#39;s contract. The latest campaign is barely a year old and dropping Knightley represents another major investments. I would think it&#39;s cheapter to release another print ad&#8230;it&#39;s still costly but a fraction of the other option. (Must have something to do with Helleu&#39;s passing, but who knows?)</p>
<p>Those are my thoughts for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43223</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43223</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right about the vices! Yes, you can tune it out once you know what kind of game the corporations are playing. But it&#039;s out there so we might as well have a sense of what going on so we don&#039;t get caught dancing to the tune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re absolutely right about the vices! Yes, you can tune it out once you know what kind of game the corporations are playing. But it&#39;s out there so we might as well have a sense of what going on so we don&#39;t get caught dancing to the tune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43231</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43231</guid>
		<description>I thought the ad with Vanessa Paradis in a birdcage was brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the ad with Vanessa Paradis in a birdcage was brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43222</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43222</guid>
		<description>For God&#039;s sake she looks like Lolita! That suit is too old for her, and the lipstick - did she steal her Mum&#039;s?

I see her in sands and pale golds - she could do Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, or if it really must be top of the tops - then Hermes. She is not vampish enough for Chanel, which at 17 is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For God&#39;s sake she looks like Lolita! That suit is too old for her, and the lipstick &#8211; did she steal her Mum&#39;s?</p>
<p>I see her in sands and pale golds &#8211; she could do Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, or if it really must be top of the tops &#8211; then Hermes. She is not vampish enough for Chanel, which at 17 is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/14/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43226</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2008/06/15/celebrity-perfume-news-round-up-2008-part-the-tenth/#comment-43226</guid>
		<description>Exactly -- hotly! 

I did see that about AJ. I&#039;ve already reported it as a rumor, so didn&#039;t see the point in repeating it since it&#039;s still at the rumor stage, LOL...we don&#039;t want to make Coty &quot;hotly&quot; deny anything ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly &#8212; hotly! </p>
<p>I did see that about AJ. I&#39;ve already reported it as a rumor, so didn&#39;t see the point in repeating it since it&#39;s still at the rumor stage, LOL&#8230;we don&#39;t want to make Coty &#8220;hotly&#8221; deny anything <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
