Thierry Mugler Angel a drug?, part 2

For anyone interested in another angle on the NTEF vs Clarins story, see More on NTEF and Angel Perfume at thearomaconnection blog.

The article was written by Tony Burfield of Cropwatch, and contains a link to an older article of his that might be of interest to those of us who ponder the health risks associated with synthetic fragrances: Chemophobia.

Filed in topic:

Tags:

9 Comments

Read more about commenting at Now Smell This.

  1. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    Maybe it would make sense to only choose perfumes from perfume houses that have their own Nose and that have no link with a big multinational?

    It is all so much information, it's almost suffocating.

    In the end the responsabilities are in the hands of the companies and of course no customer wants to buy a health risk in a bottle!

  2. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    I don't know what difference it would make to only buy from houses that have their own perfumers. There is no reason to think the materials used would be any safer, and further, just because they have their own nose, doesn't mean that one of the big Fragrance & Flavor companies isn't producing the juice.

  3. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    That is true too.

    I just don't know what to do with all this information.

    A spritz is just such a small amount and part of it goes in the air instead of touching the skin. Maybe we breathe it in maybe not?

    What is the alternative?

    I can't escape the fumes of city life and these are much more concentrated and probably equally as dangerous.

    Perfumes have been created for thousands of years and I don't want to give up these pleasures. Pleasures and dangers often go hand-in-hand.

  4. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    Did you read the article “Chemophobia” linked to above? Might set your mind at ease, at least a little.

  5. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    Read it and will put it aside me. Quickly went to Marionnaud and tried some Burburry Brit for women. (By the way, the basenotes of Karma were rather nice).

  6. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    Actually it was Burberry Brit Gold, tried the wrong one, anyway.

  7. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    I think it's all a bit of a tempest in a teapot for us recreational fragrance users. We're simply not exposed to significant amounts of chemicals with a spritz here and there through the day, regardless of the fume we're using. It's sad, really. What next? Ban the evil chocolate cupcake?

  8. Anonymous
    Posted on 19 November 2007

    Certainly all a tempest in a teapot for me! Love the term “recreational fragrance users” :-)

  9. Anonymous
    Posted on 20 November 2007

    Although I'm closer to an outright addict, I'm afraid to say!

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Shop for perfume

    Parfum1
  • Subscribe to NST

  • Search

  • Login to comment

  • Browse by…

  • Advertisement

  • Blogroll

  • From NST at Twitter

    nowsmellthisnowsmellthis: Stella McCartney in conversation with Alexandra Shulman (video, talks about new scent L.I.L.Y) http://t.co/VAKYigvK
    22 hours ago
    nowsmellthisnowsmellthis: "French parfumier Guerlain on trial over 'race slurs'" article at Telegraph http://t.co/lVDxoZMi
    24 hours ago
    nowsmellthisnowsmellthis: Scents of Self interviews Victoria of Bois de Jasmine http://t.co/2WoMMRyV
    2 days ago
    nowsmellthisnowsmellthis: "New Yankees fragrance strikes nostrils this month" http://t.co/yEyXibgl
    2 days ago
    nowsmellthisnowsmellthis: Vote for NST's Mood Board on FB and win a Zoya Nail Polish collection! http://t.co/MXHMN7I3
    2 days ago