<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keira Knightley for Chanel&#039;s Coco Mademoiselle, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28332</guid>
		<description>I remember seeing Nicole Kidman ads for No. 5 myself. The article said they&#039;d only done cable ads, not network, so perhaps it is true -- I certainly don&#039;t remember what channels I was watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember seeing Nicole Kidman ads for No. 5 myself. The article said they&#39;d only done cable ads, not network, so perhaps it is true &#8212; I certainly don&#39;t remember what channels I was watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28331</guid>
		<description>&quot;The campaign marks the first time in 15 years that Chanel has bankrolled ads on national network TV.&quot;

Weird...I live in Argentina and Chanel bankrolls ads on national television every time they make a major launch (I distinctly remember &quot;Chance&quot; being heavily promoted here)

I think Kiera is underfed.... being a skeletor (by gift of genes) myself ..I can say that someone that looks as skinny on print or screen (which ads 10 pounds for real) needs to go get a sandwich like, yesterday! :)

Coco Madmoiselle is one of the prettiest concepts of Chanel.

Very interesting frag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The campaign marks the first time in 15 years that Chanel has bankrolled ads on national network TV.&#8221;</p>
<p>Weird&#8230;I live in Argentina and Chanel bankrolls ads on national television every time they make a major launch (I distinctly remember &#8220;Chance&#8221; being heavily promoted here)</p>
<p>I think Kiera is underfed&#8230;. being a skeletor (by gift of genes) myself ..I can say that someone that looks as skinny on print or screen (which ads 10 pounds for real) needs to go get a sandwich like, yesterday! <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Coco Madmoiselle is one of the prettiest concepts of Chanel.</p>
<p>Very interesting frag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28330</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28330</guid>
		<description>I liked Enduring Love too, but for some reason, really didn&#039;t want to see the movie. If it was a travesty, then just as well. 

Loved Pirates, but have to say that Bloom lost all appeal for me w/o the green tights &amp; long blond hair of LOTR, LOL...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Enduring Love too, but for some reason, really didn&#39;t want to see the movie. If it was a travesty, then just as well. </p>
<p>Loved Pirates, but have to say that Bloom lost all appeal for me w/o the green tights &#038; long blond hair of LOTR, LOL&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28329</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28329</guid>
		<description>Atonement is one of my favourite books ever - just mesmeric.  I only hope they don&#039;t mess it up as they did with Enduring Love, which was a travesty.  I&#039;m not sure quite how the beauteous Miss Knightley will fit the part (I presume she&#039;s playing Cecilia rather than Briony?) but at least she&#039;s got the right kind of accent.  I enjoyed her in Pirates, if only because I&#039;ve never seen three such stunningly gorgeous people together in one frame - I wonder the screen didn&#039;t melt under the onslaught of KK and Messrs. Depp and Bloom....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atonement is one of my favourite books ever &#8211; just mesmeric.  I only hope they don&#39;t mess it up as they did with Enduring Love, which was a travesty.  I&#39;m not sure quite how the beauteous Miss Knightley will fit the part (I presume she&#39;s playing Cecilia rather than Briony?) but at least she&#39;s got the right kind of accent.  I enjoyed her in Pirates, if only because I&#39;ve never seen three such stunningly gorgeous people together in one frame &#8211; I wonder the screen didn&#39;t melt under the onslaught of KK and Messrs. Depp and Bloom&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28328</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28328</guid>
		<description>Yep, a romp. Enjoyed it tremendously. The 2nd one was so darned long I almost fell asleep, and so therefore might skip the 3rd. Missed Bend it Like Beckham, and apparently Hole too ;-)

Atonement is just that -- melancholic &amp; unforgiving. Great book though, if you can work up to the mood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, a romp. Enjoyed it tremendously. The 2nd one was so darned long I almost fell asleep, and so therefore might skip the 3rd. Missed Bend it Like Beckham, and apparently Hole too <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Atonement is just that &#8212; melancholic &#038; unforgiving. Great book though, if you can work up to the mood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28327</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28327</guid>
		<description>I think I know what you mean about Pirates not counting! The first was an enjoyable romp (almost entirely due to Johnny Depp), the second was boring and I haven&#039;t bothered with the third. She was alright in Bend it like Beckham. Then I think there was something called &quot;Hole&quot; and its probably best if I leave the subject there! Haven&#039;t read &quot;Atonement&quot; - I have found his books quite melancholic and sort of unforgiving if that makes sense. Still, the film does have an amazing cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I know what you mean about Pirates not counting! The first was an enjoyable romp (almost entirely due to Johnny Depp), the second was boring and I haven&#39;t bothered with the third. She was alright in Bend it like Beckham. Then I think there was something called &#8220;Hole&#8221; and its probably best if I leave the subject there! Haven&#39;t read &#8220;Atonement&#8221; &#8211; I have found his books quite melancholic and sort of unforgiving if that makes sense. Still, the film does have an amazing cast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28326</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28326</guid>
		<description>I will see Atonement (eventually) no matter who is in it -- loved the book. Don&#039;t have any big opinions on KK so far. Didn&#039;t like her in Pride &amp; Prejudice, but didn&#039;t like the movie in general so can&#039;t blame her in particular. Haven&#039;t seen her in anything else but Pirates, which doesn&#039;t count does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will see Atonement (eventually) no matter who is in it &#8212; loved the book. Don&#39;t have any big opinions on KK so far. Didn&#39;t like her in Pride &#038; Prejudice, but didn&#39;t like the movie in general so can&#39;t blame her in particular. Haven&#39;t seen her in anything else but Pirates, which doesn&#39;t count does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28323</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28323</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28325</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28325</guid>
		<description>Yes, a sandwich and acting lessons. I agree with Helg above in her summation on her blog. Oh dear! I know you&#039;re not supposed to say anything if you can&#039;t say anything nice but I don&#039;t get Ms Knightly. I&#039;m refusing to go see &quot;Atonement&quot;, best Brit film in years etc etc largely because she&#039;s in it. (Romola Garai by far the better actress IMHO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a sandwich and acting lessons. I agree with Helg above in her summation on her blog. Oh dear! I know you&#39;re not supposed to say anything if you can&#39;t say anything nice but I don&#39;t get Ms Knightly. I&#39;m refusing to go see &#8220;Atonement&#8221;, best Brit film in years etc etc largely because she&#39;s in it. (Romola Garai by far the better actress IMHO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28324</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/09/03/keira-knightley-for-chanels-coco-mademoiselle-part-2/#comment-28324</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase the Go Fug Yourself girls: Somebody get that girl a sandwich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase the Go Fug Yourself girls: Somebody get that girl a sandwich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 318/322 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 16:07:37 -->
