<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estee Lauder Pleasures Delight ~ fragrance review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:57:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: OVincze</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-243324</link>
		<dc:creator>OVincze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-243324</guid>
		<description>Yes this used to be the &quot;One&quot; for me and men would stop me and ask me what I was wearing, it was before I switched to Sensous and then Sensous Noir and now may be off to Sensous Nude as well though that does smell a bit too sweet maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this used to be the &#8220;One&#8221; for me and men would stop me and ask me what I was wearing, it was before I switched to Sensous and then Sensous Noir and now may be off to Sensous Nude as well though that does smell a bit too sweet maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-72403</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-72403</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really well done, &amp; don&#039;t see any reason why anybody shouldn&#039;t like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really well done, &amp; don&#8217;t see any reason why anybody shouldn&#8217;t like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-72280</link>
		<dc:creator>Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-72280</guid>
		<description>This one&#039;s probably my favorite! I wasn&#039;t expecting to like it, but then there you go. My fiance adores it too, and seriously, that so rarely coincides. I&#039;m not one for all this snobbery over the &quot;gourmand / sweet /fruity category which is popular with the masses.&quot; If I like it, I like it. If I don&#039;t, I don&#039;t. It is true that I generally dislike things that become popular, especially if I&#039;ve been wearing them. I&#039;m silly like that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one&#8217;s probably my favorite! I wasn&#8217;t expecting to like it, but then there you go. My fiance adores it too, and seriously, that so rarely coincides. I&#8217;m not one for all this snobbery over the &#8220;gourmand / sweet /fruity category which is popular with the masses.&#8221; If I like it, I like it. If I don&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t. It is true that I generally dislike things that become popular, especially if I&#8217;ve been wearing them. I&#8217;m silly like that. <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26590</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26590</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear from another fan :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear from another fan <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26589</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26589</guid>
		<description>I love this one! this is my all time fav!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this one! this is my all time fav!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26588</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26588</guid>
		<description>Will have to try them together one of these days -- didn&#039;t think of Coco Mlle right away. So many of these are working with the same fruity-sweet palette that it isn&#039;t surprising they remind everyone of another scent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will have to try them together one of these days &#8212; didn&#39;t think of Coco Mlle right away. So many of these are working with the same fruity-sweet palette that it isn&#39;t surprising they remind everyone of another scent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26587</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26587</guid>
		<description>Does anyone find that it smells suspciously like Chanel Coco Mlle? They have the same base. But Iinstead of the fresh (albeit sweet) lychee top notes in Coco Mlle, EL Pleassures Delight has that annoying strawberry note in the beginning. In any case, Pleasures Delight smells so close to my mother&#039;s staple (Coco Mlle) that she pestered me to buy Pleasures Delight for her as a slightly cheaper alternative to the Coco Mlle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone find that it smells suspciously like Chanel Coco Mlle? They have the same base. But Iinstead of the fresh (albeit sweet) lychee top notes in Coco Mlle, EL Pleassures Delight has that annoying strawberry note in the beginning. In any case, Pleasures Delight smells so close to my mother&#39;s staple (Coco Mlle) that she pestered me to buy Pleasures Delight for her as a slightly cheaper alternative to the Coco Mlle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26586</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26586</guid>
		<description>It is true that it has almost nothing to do with the original. I didn&#039;t find it that strong, exactly, but it certainly packs more of a punch than Pleasures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that it has almost nothing to do with the original. I didn&#39;t find it that strong, exactly, but it certainly packs more of a punch than Pleasures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26585</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26585</guid>
		<description>I really expected to like this new pleasures, since the original is one of my favorite perfumes. This wasn&#039;t really what I expected either, and I didn&#039;t quite like it. I actually found it a bit strong. But maybe I will give it another try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really expected to like this new pleasures, since the original is one of my favorite perfumes. This wasn&#39;t really what I expected either, and I didn&#39;t quite like it. I actually found it a bit strong. But maybe I will give it another try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26584</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/07/25/estee-lauder-pleasures-delight-fragrance-review/#comment-26584</guid>
		<description>Yes very true, will try it on when i get to the big city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes very true, will try it on when i get to the big city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 316/316 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 14:04:37 -->
