Comments on: A few fragrant wishes for 2007 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/ a blog about perfume Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:49:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19132 Anonymous Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:06:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19132 Chypre, yes, aldehydes, maybe, and let me add woods, incense, anything but fruit! Chypre, yes, aldehydes, maybe, and let me add woods, incense, anything but fruit!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19131 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:08:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19131 Chypre. I'm thinking chypre and aldehydes should be the two MAJOR trends everyone gets on for the next two years. I'm wondering if you'll be spending all your 2006 savings in 2007! Also, I'm as sick of frooty-florals as you are, but somehow I can ignore them. The trend I'd really wish would go away are the nauseatingly sweet dessert-scents (JS Dessert, Pink Sugar, etc.) Chypre. I'm thinking chypre and aldehydes should be the two MAJOR trends everyone gets on for the next two years.
I'm wondering if you'll be spending all your 2006 savings in 2007!
Also, I'm as sick of frooty-florals as you are, but somehow I can ignore them. The trend I'd really wish would go away are the nauseatingly sweet dessert-scents (JS Dessert, Pink Sugar, etc.)

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19130 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:58:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19130 Welcome back :-) Agree with "to each his/her own" -- but for the rest of us, I do wish there was a bit more diversity. It still seems like 80% of the new releases are sweet fruity florals. Sigh. Welcome back :-)

Agree with “to each his/her own” — but for the rest of us, I do wish there was a bit more diversity. It still seems like 80% of the new releases are sweet fruity florals. Sigh.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19128 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:57:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19128 Actually, for my tastes, they'll have a hard time beating L&E, but sounds like you are going to be (maybe?) easier to please with something entirely different. Actually, for my tastes, they'll have a hard time beating L&E, but sounds like you are going to be (maybe?) easier to please with something entirely different.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19129 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:18:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19129 Hi Robin...I've been out of here for a little while, reading every day but haven't commented. I just love this site. Anyway...I'm SO with you on the sweet fruity floral issue. I've never been a fan and I wish more people would see it the way I do. There's so many amazing scents...but I could do without these. I know some love them...and to each his/her own. I guess I just don't find them interesting at all. Hi Robin…I've been out of here for a little while, reading every day but haven't commented. I just love this site. Anyway…I'm SO with you on the sweet fruity floral issue. I've never been a fan and I wish more people would see it the way I do. There's so many amazing scents…but I could do without these. I know some love them…and to each his/her own. I guess I just don't find them interesting at all.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19127 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:38:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19127 I want POTL to live up to the name. It's bland, sweet cherry cough drops on me. I want POTL to live up to the name. It's bland, sweet cherry cough drops on me.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19126 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:15:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19126 Well, by POTL I don't mean it as it is currently used (as an abbreviation for Luctor et Emergo), but as we'll have to use it in the future assuming they *do* release a 2nd scent, that is, as an abbreviation for the brand. Whew, did that make any sense? I'm tired ;-) Well, by POTL I don't mean it as it is currently used (as an abbreviation for Luctor et Emergo), but as we'll have to use it in the future assuming they *do* release a 2nd scent, that is, as an abbreviation for the brand. Whew, did that make any sense? I'm tired ;-)

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19124 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:14:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19124 I did so well in 2006 in terms of spending, but 2007 could be dangerous :-) I did so well in 2006 in terms of spending, but 2007 could be dangerous :-)

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19120 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:13:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19120 I am going to just try to forget they ever called it a chypre, LOL...otherwise, I'm bound to be disappointed. I am going to just try to forget they ever called it a chypre, LOL…otherwise, I'm bound to be disappointed.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19125 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:05:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2007/01/02/a-few-fragrant-wishes-for-2007/#comment-19125 I wholeheartedly second all of your wishes...except for this: "We need a POTL no. 2." We don't! We need something different, don't we? Why would we need another POTL? Please, say we don't need another POTL! :-) I wholeheartedly second all of your wishes…except for this:
“We need a POTL no. 2.”
We don't! We need something different, don't we? Why would we need another POTL? Please, say we don't need another POTL! :-)

]]>