Comments on: New fragrance: Lotus for men http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/ a blog about perfume Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:17:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13708 Anonymous Tue, 09 May 2006 18:29:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13708 I'm sure your average man would take something that evoked the car over the flower, LOL... I'm sure your average man would take something that evoked the car over the flower, LOL…

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13707 Anonymous Tue, 09 May 2006 18:01:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13707 It's called Lotus but there's no lotus in it? LOL Lotus could be gorgeous in a men's scent! It's called Lotus but there's no lotus in it? LOL

Lotus could be gorgeous in a men's scent!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13706 Anonymous Tue, 09 May 2006 16:12:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13706 You never know, it could be fabulous! Will be interesting to see if Sephora picks it up. You never know, it could be fabulous! Will be interesting to see if Sephora picks it up.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13705 Anonymous Tue, 09 May 2006 14:40:00 +0000 http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/05/09/new-fragrance-lotus-for-men/#comment-13705 I usually bypass anything with a car name, but I admit that the notes sound wonderful. Violets in a men's scent doesn't come along too often - and since I'll happily men's scents as well, I'll have to remember to try it if I see it. I usually bypass anything with a car name, but I admit that the notes sound wonderful. Violets in a men's scent doesn't come along too often – and since I'll happily men's scents as well, I'll have to remember to try it if I see it.

]]>