<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fifi Awards for 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12760</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12760</guid>
		<description>P, I really thought SJP Lovely would win in that category!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P, I really thought SJP Lovely would win in that category!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12759</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12759</guid>
		<description>I was so surprised at the win by Euphoria,  but then I spoke to an SA at the local Kaufmanns.  She told me that ever since it was launched, it was the top selling perfume in her store.  

I&#039;m not sure if sales have anything to do with wins,  but it did sort of satisfy my curiosity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so surprised at the win by Euphoria,  but then I spoke to an SA at the local Kaufmanns.  She told me that ever since it was launched, it was the top selling perfume in her store.  </p>
<p>I&#39;m not sure if sales have anything to do with wins,  but it did sort of satisfy my curiosity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12758</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12758</guid>
		<description>I was very surprised by the winners myself. And yes, luxe isn&#039;t used the way we would use it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very surprised by the winners myself. And yes, luxe isn&#39;t used the way we would use it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12757</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2006/04/04/fifi-awards-for-2006/#comment-12757</guid>
		<description>Well, meh.  I already posted on BdJ.  Their categories are peculiar.  And who says Prive is for &quot;men?&quot;  And we clearly have different ideas about what constitutes &quot;luxe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, meh.  I already posted on BdJ.  Their categories are peculiar.  And who says Prive is for &#8220;men?&#8221;  And we clearly have different ideas about what constitutes &#8220;luxe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 228/232 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 07:47:36 -->
