<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perfume: the best of 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9619</guid>
		<description>We all forgot something -- these kinds of lists are so darn hard to do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all forgot something &#8212; these kinds of lists are so darn hard to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9618</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 05:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9618</guid>
		<description>I completely forgot about Jardin Sur Le Nil on my list!  Poor neglected little guy...I will wear this tomorrow to make up for it.

Fully agree on Flowerbomb and Alien...I was disappointed with both after all the hype they received.

And I was proud of SJP when I sniffed Lovely.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely forgot about Jardin Sur Le Nil on my list!  Poor neglected little guy&#8230;I will wear this tomorrow to make up for it.</p>
<p>Fully agree on Flowerbomb and Alien&#8230;I was disappointed with both after all the hype they received.</p>
<p>And I was proud of SJP when I sniffed Lovely.  <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9617</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 23:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9617</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much Iris, that is very kind! Hope your 2006 is happy &amp; healthy :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much Iris, that is very kind! Hope your 2006 is happy &#038; healthy <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9616</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9616</guid>
		<description>My vote for Best of 2005:  Now Smell This blog!  A very Happy New Year to you, dear R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote for Best of 2005:  Now Smell This blog!  A very Happy New Year to you, dear R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9581</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9581</guid>
		<description>Ah, if it isn&#039;t outrageously priced, I&#039;ll have to try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, if it isn&#39;t outrageously priced, I&#39;ll have to try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9615</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9615</guid>
		<description>Totally agree on the SJP -- they did an excellent job. Actually I like Cumming better than Lovely, but didn&#039;t even consider it as best celebrity fragrance. It just doesn&#039;t seem like a celebrity fragrance at all (?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree on the SJP &#8212; they did an excellent job. Actually I like Cumming better than Lovely, but didn&#39;t even consider it as best celebrity fragrance. It just doesn&#39;t seem like a celebrity fragrance at all (?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9614</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9614</guid>
		<description>The Cumming ad campaign is delciously funny. But to mention another celeb frag, I thought Lovely was marketed rather smartly. Just a tinge of celebrity gawking at SJP, but not losing the focus on the scent itself. It certainly wasn&#039;t quite so crassly done as with some other celeb scents (*looking at you J-Lo and your never ending glow*.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cumming ad campaign is delciously funny. But to mention another celeb frag, I thought Lovely was marketed rather smartly. Just a tinge of celebrity gawking at SJP, but not losing the focus on the scent itself. It certainly wasn&#39;t quite so crassly done as with some other celeb scents (*looking at you J-Lo and your never ending glow*.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9580</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9580</guid>
		<description>The Givenchy Amarige one is really quite lovely. It will not convert new fans to Amarige, but for those that already love it, it is a nice excuse to purchase this LE rather than a bottle of the regular stuff. And not too terribly obnoxiously higher priced than the regular, either. It&#039;s certainly worth a look-sniff for Amarige fans, though I honestly doubt anyone but previous fans of that scent will care too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Givenchy Amarige one is really quite lovely. It will not convert new fans to Amarige, but for those that already love it, it is a nice excuse to purchase this LE rather than a bottle of the regular stuff. And not too terribly obnoxiously higher priced than the regular, either. It&#39;s certainly worth a look-sniff for Amarige fans, though I honestly doubt anyone but previous fans of that scent will care too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9613</guid>
		<description>J, I hated it the first time, so I completely understand the &quot;furniture polish&quot;, LOL! It is a very strange smell, but I do love it. I know very well that it isn&#039;t universally liked (major understatement) so I am only wearing it at home. 

But don&#039;t thank me -- Katie &amp; Annie did all the organizing this time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J, I hated it the first time, so I completely understand the &#8220;furniture polish&#8221;, LOL! It is a very strange smell, but I do love it. I know very well that it isn&#39;t universally liked (major understatement) so I am only wearing it at home. </p>
<p>But don&#39;t thank me &#8212; Katie &#038; Annie did all the organizing this time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/12/30/perfume-the-best-of-2005/#comment-9611</guid>
		<description>The NY SAs seemed to me to be doing high church in a very tongue in cheek way. It was hard to keep a straight face, but it wasn&#039;t as snotty as I thought it would be. I liked the Jardenia, but early in the morning I can see how it would be a bit much, LOL! Bolt of Lightning was my favorite though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY SAs seemed to me to be doing high church in a very tongue in cheek way. It was hard to keep a straight face, but it wasn&#39;t as snotty as I thought it would be. I liked the Jardenia, but early in the morning I can see how it would be a bit much, LOL! Bolt of Lightning was my favorite though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 314/318 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 10:21:14 -->
