Perfume lawsuit update

The woman who was awarded 10.6 million dollars after claiming that a co-worker’s Tresor perfume made her sick has had her award lowered to $814,000 by a judge in Detroit. (via United Press International; link to article no longer working)

Filed in topic:

Tags:

12 Comments

Read more about commenting at Now Smell This.

  1. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    I wonder if she'll buy any perfume with that money?!!

  2. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    It's the wrong blog for that, but I would like to *slap* that woman.

  3. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    LOL — I had the same, sick response: gee, you could buy a lot of perfume for $800,000.

  4. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    I know absolutely zero about chemical sensitivities or how serious her claim was. I think she was suing for being wrongfully fired, not really entirely for the Tresor incident? But the amount of the original settlement was obviously ridiculous & easy fodder for jokes.

  5. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    Hey, I feel her pain — Tresor makes me kind of sick, too. Hmmm… I wonder what kind of settlement I could get from Hechts for my pain and suffering after that SA drenched me in Trouble. C'mon, that's worth a couple mil right there!

  6. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    Well, its worth at least a free bottle of something better than Trouble :-)

  7. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    Great…now you won't be able to wear perfume anywhere. Soon they'll have a “perfume” section in resturants. Seriously, this is bad for us…

  8. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    That comment made me laugh out loud!! Makes you wonder how that lady did ANYTHING without getting whiffs of something somewhere. I would love to read the transcript on that case — or meet the attorney who took it on! :)

    Too funny – Smoking or Nonsmoking? Decaf or regular? Leaded or unleaded? Fragrance or unfragranced? hahahaha Great comment raincheck!

    Happy New Year all -

  9. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    LOL at both of you!

    But seriously, I don't see this as having a huge impact. The judge actually sounded pretty disgusted with the whole thing, and questioned whether the woman had a real perfume allergy at all.

  10. Anonymous
    Posted on 29 December 2005

    He said the jury had been “inflamed” and he'd been tempted to toss the whole thing … I'd love to know how they'd been “inflamed” … and I have such a jaundiced view of the whole chemical sensitivity thing … *gets ready to be assaulted* … to my mind, there's a whole lot of Munchhausen's Syndrome going on with this (illness as an attention-getting mechanism) oh. and Happy New Year, R! ♥ xoxo

  11. Anonymous
    Posted on 30 December 2005

    LOL — maybe they sprayed Tresor on the jury?

    Happy New Year to you too M! Hope it is a great one.

  12. Anonymous
    Posted on 30 November 2008

    Hello all, FYI:
    Did you know that money you win in a lawsuit is non-taxable?
    Same goes for money you get from an insurance claim or settlement. Now you can see why so many people would rather take their chances on filing and maybe winning lawsuits than go to work.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Shop for perfume


  • Subscribe to NST

  • Search

  • Browse by…

  • Advertisement

    Perfumes Search by Color Fragrantica
  • Blogroll

  • Contest