<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &amp; upcoming fragrances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>K, I didn&#039;t think so at all! 

&quot;Original&quot; implies to me an older formula too, to distinguish from something new. I think it is a strange marketing tactic, and liable to confuse consumers looking to repurchase a scent they have been wearing for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, I didn&#39;t think so at all! </p>
<p>&#8220;Original&#8221; implies to me an older formula too, to distinguish from something new. I think it is a strange marketing tactic, and liable to confuse consumers looking to repurchase a scent they have been wearing for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>I just reread my post and realized how vastly lacking in English language skills it makes me sound.  I see what they are doing now.  By &quot;original&quot;, they are implying that this fragrance is an unusual new approach to sandalwood.  I jumped to the conclusion that they were rereleasing their very first sandalwood fragrance from however many centuries ago created for whatever famous person.  I&#039;m totally over Creed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just reread my post and realized how vastly lacking in English language skills it makes me sound.  I see what they are doing now.  By &#8220;original&#8221;, they are implying that this fragrance is an unusual new approach to sandalwood.  I jumped to the conclusion that they were rereleasing their very first sandalwood fragrance from however many centuries ago created for whatever famous person.  I&#39;m totally over Creed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>K, I have no earthly idea. Their new Vetiver scent was also called &quot;Original&quot;, even though they have an older Vetiver fragrance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, I have no earthly idea. Their new Vetiver scent was also called &#8220;Original&#8221;, even though they have an older Vetiver fragrance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little confused as to why a &quot;totally new take&quot; has been entitled &quot;Original&quot;, but curious as to how this will compare to their current lackluster sandalwood offering, Santal Imperial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a little confused as to why a &#8220;totally new take&#8221; has been entitled &#8220;Original&#8221;, but curious as to how this will compare to their current lackluster sandalwood offering, Santal Imperial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>K, I have noticed at several MAC counters that they keep the fragrances behind the counter, so it is worth asking. I think they just don&#039;t have room with all that eyeshadow :-)

Took Saturday&#039;s post down because after reading the  TOS more carefully, it occurred to me that I might be construed as &quot;calling attention to the ads&quot;, which you are not allowed to do. Don&#039;t want to get kicked out before I get started!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, I have noticed at several MAC counters that they keep the fragrances behind the counter, so it is worth asking. I think they just don&#39;t have room with all that eyeshadow <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Took Saturday&#39;s post down because after reading the  TOS more carefully, it occurred to me that I might be construed as &#8220;calling attention to the ads&#8221;, which you are not allowed to do. Don&#39;t want to get kicked out before I get started!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3374</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/06/20/new-upcoming-fragrances/#comment-3374</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this info. I&#039;ve been curious about the MAC scents, but was never able to find them.  I wonder if these scents be available at their dept store counters, or just at the free-standing MAC stores.

I didn&#039;t get a chance to comment on the ads, and I see you took that thread off the blog, but they are just fine with me. They&#039;re unobtrusive and keep with the informational tone of your writing. I know how much time I spend composing a 3 paragraph email to  friends - sometimes upwards of 1/2 hour - and they&#039;re just about nonsense!  I can only imagine how much time and effort you pour into NST.  You deserve to be compensated for this wonderful blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info. I&#39;ve been curious about the MAC scents, but was never able to find them.  I wonder if these scents be available at their dept store counters, or just at the free-standing MAC stores.</p>
<p>I didn&#39;t get a chance to comment on the ads, and I see you took that thread off the blog, but they are just fine with me. They&#39;re unobtrusive and keep with the informational tone of your writing. I know how much time I spend composing a 3 paragraph email to  friends &#8211; sometimes upwards of 1/2 hour &#8211; and they&#39;re just about nonsense!  I can only imagine how much time and effort you pour into NST.  You deserve to be compensated for this wonderful blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 269/273 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 07:24:11 -->
