<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amouage Ubar ~ fragrance review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/</link>
	<description>a blog about perfume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-135132</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-135132</guid>
		<description>It really is lovely. I still lament the old, which probably wasn&#039;t sustainable given the state of sandalwood in the wild these days. Oh well. Glad you love the new, and good luck getting some!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is lovely. I still lament the old, which probably wasn&#8217;t sustainable given the state of sandalwood in the wild these days. Oh well. Glad you love the new, and good luck getting some!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mals86</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-134949</link>
		<dc:creator>mals86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-134949</guid>
		<description>I see I&#039;m *well* beyond the curve again - here it is Jan. 2010 and I&#039;m just getting to Ubar!

Thanks to swaps, I now find myself in possession of a sample of both the original edp (carded!) and the re-release.  The original is a light floral-woody, quite lovely, and the new is Just My Sort of Thing, an oriental floral heavy on the floral. 

I&#039;m with OperaFan up there - I&#039;ve been wearing the new to work for the past couple of days. Just one dab from the vial is the right amount, though - spraying would definitely make it too much for the office, while one dab keeps the sillage within my customary 3-foot radius.  

As with all the Amouages, a whole bottle is out of my reach, but maybe I can snag a small decant.  That ought to be enough, especially since one dab is a day&#039;s worth of scent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see I&#8217;m *well* beyond the curve again &#8211; here it is Jan. 2010 and I&#8217;m just getting to Ubar!</p>
<p>Thanks to swaps, I now find myself in possession of a sample of both the original edp (carded!) and the re-release.  The original is a light floral-woody, quite lovely, and the new is Just My Sort of Thing, an oriental floral heavy on the floral. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with OperaFan up there &#8211; I&#8217;ve been wearing the new to work for the past couple of days. Just one dab from the vial is the right amount, though &#8211; spraying would definitely make it too much for the office, while one dab keeps the sillage within my customary 3-foot radius.  </p>
<p>As with all the Amouages, a whole bottle is out of my reach, but maybe I can snag a small decant.  That ought to be enough, especially since one dab is a day&#8217;s worth of scent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-85152</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-85152</guid>
		<description>Drat, wish you&#039;d given that vintage bottle to me, LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drat, wish you&#8217;d given that vintage bottle to me, LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebor</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-85146</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-85146</guid>
		<description>Well, I was VERY fortunate enough to snag a sealed 50ml EDP bottle of the original Ubar last year (for about £25). While I found it to be everything mentioned in your review, especially with regards to the sandalwood and rose, it was far to soft on my skin. 

For several weeks, I found myself changing my mind about it (and the ugly bottle didn&#039;t help matters either). In the end, I sold it off for a very nice profit (a few months before it&#039;s re-release was announced). 

Do I regret it? No, not really. Would I be interested in the new version? Personally, I found Lyric for women far more satisfying from a male point of view (although I do miss the rich sandalwood accord).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was VERY fortunate enough to snag a sealed 50ml EDP bottle of the original Ubar last year (for about £25). While I found it to be everything mentioned in your review, especially with regards to the sandalwood and rose, it was far to soft on my skin. </p>
<p>For several weeks, I found myself changing my mind about it (and the ugly bottle didn&#8217;t help matters either). In the end, I sold it off for a very nice profit (a few months before it&#8217;s re-release was announced). </p>
<p>Do I regret it? No, not really. Would I be interested in the new version? Personally, I found Lyric for women far more satisfying from a male point of view (although I do miss the rich sandalwood accord).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83711</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83711</guid>
		<description>No, the EdT was already discontinued when I wrote this article in 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the EdT was already discontinued when I wrote this article in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuddy Duddy 101</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83601</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuddy Duddy 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83601</guid>
		<description>Meant to add in my post  that I went to the Amouge web site but it&#039;s under maintenance, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meant to add in my post  that I went to the Amouge web site but it&#8217;s under maintenance, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuddy Duddy 101</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83600</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuddy Duddy 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83600</guid>
		<description>Is it still available as an EDT anywhere or does this new EDP version replace the EDT? Sounds like they should keep both,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it still available as an EDT anywhere or does this new EDP version replace the EDT? Sounds like they should keep both,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83581</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83581</guid>
		<description>It is not cheap. I wish it was still $60 :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not cheap. I wish it was still $60 <img src='http://www.nstperfume.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83580</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83580</guid>
		<description>Agree with Joe -- would not call it a &quot;rich oriental&quot; at all. More like a rich floral to my nose, regardless of its official classification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Joe &#8212; would not call it a &#8220;rich oriental&#8221; at all. More like a rich floral to my nose, regardless of its official classification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83579</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nstperfume.com/2005/05/19/fragrance-review-amouage-ubar/#comment-83579</guid>
		<description>And I need to revisit Dia...must do that soon, although did not love it the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I need to revisit Dia&#8230;must do that soon, although did not love it the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.034 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/314 objects using memcached

Served from: www.nstperfume.com @ 2012-02-10 09:32:06 -->
